Princess Eugenie of York has announced the birth of her third child, a baby girl, with her husband, Jack Brooksbank. Princess Eugenie, the youngest daughter of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Sarah Ferguson, shared the news on social media, accompanied by a photograph of the newborn. Princess Eugenie wrote: “Jack and I are so excited to announce Baby Girl Brooksbank!! We are beyond in love with our girlie.”
Buckingham Palace said that Eugenie gave birth at a hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, on Monday evening. The baby weighed six pounds and nine ounces at birth. Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank, who married in October 2018, welcomed their first son, August, in February 2021 and their second son, Ernest, in May 2023.
Princess Eugenie's daughter wore the Angel Wing Pointelle Sleepsuit by Marie-Chantal. Princess Eugenie chose the high-end childrenswear brand Marie-Chantal London for her daughter's first public outfit. The sleepsuit is easily recognizable by its signature wing detail, a design element for which the brand is well known.
Whatever anyone’s wider issues with the Yorks, it is always lovely to welcome a healthy baby. I wish the family well. LRB
ReplyDeleteHm... Wonder why the princess and her husband didn't introduce the baby right out on the steps? Like many demanded the duchess and the prince should do.
ReplyDeleteCute baby and outfit.
Princess Eugenie has never been classified it’s a ‘ working royal’ However H & M were at the time of Archie’s birth. Hence the expectation of a photo call
DeletePrincess Eugenie gave birth in Portugal; she’s not in direct line to the throne, hence no photographs on the “step”.
DeleteShe has never been a working royal.
DeleteThe duke should have briefed his duchess better of protocol prior to marriage.
T
NN, it’s not a worthy comparison. Nobody “demanded” that Meghan present the baby, but many were miffed at the unnecessary lying and misleading regarding the birth timing, and disappointed after the fact that they hadn’t got the traditional immediate father’s announcement and baby presentation. It seemed sneaky and that does not go down well.
DeleteMoeten we deze personen nog aandacht geven ?
ReplyDeleteAgree !!
DeleteYou are completely free to not pay attention - don't click. All others can decide for themselves.
DeleteI appreciate the baby is wearing something to keep warm, but in light of her absolute delicious gorgeousness, I couldn’t care less whether she were in a hand me down el cheapo or a high end Marie Chantal. Her cuteness overwhelms all other factors! Congrats to the parents on welcoming a gorgeous new life.
ReplyDeleteLove your comment about the baby’s delicious gorgeousness…so sweet to say and absolutely true! 😊
DeleteThank you 20:33. So many commenters criticise other commenters for having opinions (!) and it warms my heart to read your encouragement.
DeleteSo happy for them. Congratulations to this lovely, growing family.
ReplyDelete- Anon 9:13
La grenouillère est facilement reconnaissable mais heureusement que les lignes sous l'article précisent que la photo montre la première apparition publique du troisième enfant de la princesse Eugénie à savoir sa fille !
ReplyDeleteTotally agree. Great news. Given the problems in the wider York family, this must have been a tough time for Princess Eugenie. Congrats to this lovely family
DeleteSuch happy news, congratulations, Princess Eugenie!
ReplyDeleteShe couldn't introduce the baby on the steps. She gave birth in Portugual(sorry wrong spelling?).where she now lives coming to England when neccessary
ReplyDeleteIt is not because she gave birth in Portugal that she could introduce the baby on the steps. She is not a working royal and is part of the extended royal family now (since the king is her uncle not her father), and her baby is a "Brooksbank" not a "Windsor".
DeleteT
FANTASTIC,WISH THEM WELL
ReplyDeleteTheir choise to deliver in Portugal. Imagine the Duchess 😆. And only the back. Oh lord.
ReplyDeleteYes, since newborns tend to look very similar to one another, I really don’t think showing the child’s face at this point would endanger her 🙄. But I guess the back-of-the-head photo is now deemed compulsory at a certain level of perceived celebrity…
DeleteNewborns are similar - and their appearance changes so dramatically anyway, that photos let's say: in the first year would not give anyone the chance to recognize the child later. But, I am fine respecting the child's privacy anyway, best way to do this: No photos at all. If someone wants to look at sweet babies of other people, the world is full of them.
DeleteI respect the parents’ choice. But also think this photo was chosen because it shows the cuteness of the outfit’s angel wings. I too would never choose to show my children’s faces if we were famous. Once you publish to the internet it’s there forever, and can be manipulated. The children themselves can choose later to publish their own photos.
DeleteThanks 10:37. I agree with your comment.
DeleteThe internet has given us extra ways to communicate, but it brings with it, unfortunately,, a dark side also.
Great news. Congratulations to the family. Wonder what her name will be. Maybe Isabella a different version of Elisabeth. She'll have 2 big brothers to be her protectors. Welcome to the world little angel.
ReplyDeletecss
I had no idea that Marie Chantal had a baby line? did anyone else not know either?
ReplyDeleteI thought everyone knew. She has had it since the early 2000s.
DeleteT
Post a Comment